Composition Matters
The Meet the Composer residencies that started around the 1980’s have been a major force for change in the panorama of American. A whole new sense of consciousness was created among the orchestras that started to see the composers as living entities and collaborators, and not as dead people who wrote great music. This visionary endeavor has been the vehicle for the creation of many of the most important American works of the second half of the 20th century, and it was through this program some of the composers we all know today came to prominence. Another important aspect was the fact that for more than 2 decades composers have been “part of the family” in many of the orchestras of this country. How was this possible? Simple, financial support and the will and vision of John Duffy.
I feel that many of our woes can be traced to that old evil thing called money. I have just returned from Spain, a country that is enjoying a remarkably booming economy. There both the government and the banks pour million of Euros into culture. Where there were no orchestras before, wonderful ones are now playing is state of the art auditoriums built by great architects. They certainly go about with their traditional concerts, but there is a huge amount of new music being programmed. In Madrid I had three of my works played at National Auditorium (the city’s main venue for concerts), two of which were for small ensemble and the last one for a chamber orchestra. There was plenty of rehearsal time for my concert and the performance was just outstanding. The next day I attended another concert (part of the same series) where the Spanish Radio Orchestra played a contemporary program with works by Huber, Jarrell and Kyburz (all Swiss composers). This last orchestral concert would hardly have been possible in the context of American orchestra. Why? Because the music was really cutting edge, and admittedly not necessarily palatable to our audiences. In the comfort of heavy subsidies the European organizers can be daring (even self indulgent) and put together a program like the one I described with Swiss music.
Now, I seldom hear the same kind of arguments and complaints we all have here in America from my European colleagues. When working in Europe my experience has been that new works are well rehearsed and the musicians seemed in most cases to be engaged with the performance. We live in a musical world that resembles more a commercial venue, while in France, Spain, Germany, etc., they live in a world of subsidies and support that grants them incredible artistic latitude. This difference, as we know, has a profound impact in the way we do music. While orchestras on this side of the Atlantic understandably live under the constant pressure and fear of the market forces (ticket sales, the taste of the paying customers), we composers sometimes behave more like salesmen (forced to pitch our composer persona).
I have always lamented the lack of more support for music from the taxes that we all pay. We can criticize all we want some of the self indulgent creative attitudes from some European composers, but their position of privilege is truly enviable. A little less of a commercial attitude in our musical world would be healthy: treating music more like art and less than a product that needs to “sell.” For this to happen we would need more support, in fact massive support, be that from the government or from private sources. I believe that if we had more financial resources many of the things we worry about could improve. To start with, there would be more rehearsal time which would allow new works to be presented under optimal conditions. Also, orchestras would not have so much fear of presenting new works that they would deem somehow difficult for some of the public.
No comments yet.
Add your comment