Composition Matters

I was at the heated, but wonderful conversation the other night that prompted Lisa to ask, “Is it actually extra-musical or is it part of the composer’s required skill set to be workably articulate or even a charismatic advocate for his/her own work? Doesn’t this expectation handicap certain personality types?”

If I could also cross-reference Roberto here- he mentions , “I am rather skeptical about the type of networking and social interaction that aims at winning over the players as “friends”. This can create the ambiance of “good old boys club” where works are favored by virtue of “amigo-ism” (to use Chris’ term), and not by the intrinsic artistic merits of the music, a situation particularly true of certain conductors that tend to “marry” certain composers (or soloists), and whose choices are more a reflection of personal affection, and not necessarily of sound artistic judgment.”

In all honesty, I am in favor of the personal connection, with all of the risks that it entails, for one reason. I think the deepest art is built on those personal connections and meanings. It is hard to imagine the slow movement of the Schumann piano quartet or Tchaikovsky’s Sixth Symphony, much less Steve Mackey’s Dreamhouse, or Lou Harrison’s Double Concerto, without them. I’m not advocating that people be something they are not, but I do think that ultimately, phoniness will not win out and substance will prevail. So if you are a composer of few words- take Arvo Part, for example- eventually this music speaks to enough people that his notable lack of speaking is not such a liability. On the flip side, if a composer has initially had some success because he or she is a great schmoozer, that cache will eventually diminish in importance and the works will be seen for what they are.

Getting back to Lisa’s comment about being articulate and charismatic, I think it would be foolish for it not to be addressed seriously in the training of a composer. For instance, with my students at Peabody and Juilliard, I actually do a seminar at least once a year on rehearsal technique, taking a bow, etc.- not because these are the most important things, but because they are nonetheless important. Is how someone dresses important? To what extent is that statement superficial? To my way of thinking, a little bit of common sense here goes a long way.

By the way, that group of composers closed the restaurant down last night at the conversation Lisa mentioned! I’d love to get a chance to do that with more musicians!

About the author

Christopher Theofanidis
Christopher Theofanidis

Christopher Theofanidis (b. 12/18/67 in Dallas, Texas) has had performances by many leading orchestras from around the world, including the National Symphony, the London Symphony, the Oslo Philharmonic, the Orchestre Philharmonique de Monte-Carlo, the Moscow Soloists, the Atlanta and Houston Symphonies, the California Symphony (for which he was composer-in-residence from 1994 to 1996), the Oregon Symphony, the Brooklyn Philharmonic, and the Pro Arte Chamber Orchestra, among others. He will serve as Composer of the Year for the Pittsburgh Symphony for their 2006-2007 Season. Mr. Theofanidis holds degrees from Yale, the Eastman School of Music, and the University of Houston, and has been the recipient of the Masterprize, the Rome Prize, a Guggenheim Fellowship, the Barlow Prize, six ASCAP Gould Prizes, a Fulbright Fellowship to France, a Tanglewood Fellowhship, and the American Academy of Arts and Letters' Charles Ives Fellowship. Mr. Theofanidis' recent projects include an opera for the Houston Grand Opera, a ballet for the American Ballet Theatre, and a work for the Atlanta Symphony and Chorus based on the poetry of Rumi. He has served as a delegate to the US-Japan Foundation's Leadership Program and currently teaches at the Peabody Conservatory at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and the Juilliard School in New York City.

Leave a Reply