Engaging the Community
Thanks to Ann Drinan, Ray Ricker, and all at Polyphonic for making time to address this critical topic. I have been thrilled to read the comments of my fellow panelists and hope this discussion fuels more. My final thoughts focus on “what,” “how,” and “why.”
As I mentioned in my first post, orchestra education concerts have existed for over 150 years. Hearing about what orchestras are doing today with their education programs is helpful for many and worthy of more recognition. Per Yvonne’s request, I would again recommend reading about other wonderful orchestra education and community engagement projects at the following links. MetLife Community Engagement Awards and the Bank of America Awards for Education. As we continue to refine our understanding of community, I hope it includes other professional musicians and artists. Just as athletes are seen socializing together, we should not perpetuate an isolated view of the arts.
In addition to crafting quality education programs and interactive concerts, it is also important to celebrate and empower the efforts of individual orchestra musicians, board members, and staff to make their orchestra feel more like “home” in their community. The stories of personal interaction are so powerful. It is clear that many musicians enjoy these opportunities to connect and that support through professional development to improve how this work is done is critical. Effective lesson design, public speaking, and classroom/boardroom management are skills that require craft and art, similar to playing an instrument.
Finally, learning “what” and improving “how” we do these programs is important, but pinpointing why we do “outreach work” or “community engagement” is even more important. “Engaging the Community” will remain an afterthought as long as its purpose remains unclear, unconnected to the institution’s mission, and unconnected to the expressed needs of real people, be they orchestra musicians or other community members. Is the real reason to sell more tickets to an undefined future audience; to placate a policy maker or respond to a major donor’s “great idea”; or is community engagement based on a “hedgehog concept” (an understanding of what you can be the best at. The place where passion, expertise, and your economic driver meet), which addresses mutually agreed upon needs. I am not optimist about success in community engagement except in the latter.
Thankfully, future musicians will still feel compelled to spend their careers in orchestras because of the great music, and, frankly, the “promise” of relative stability and higher wages. However, I see today’s conservatory students with a much greater awareness of their varied gifts and interests, and a desire to add value to the arts over the course of their careers. If the perception continues that the orchestra field moves slowly to embrace new, or even old ideas; that individual growth is undervalued; and that our reasons are largely selfish and feel devoid of soul (“the giving without want”), then these musicians may not be committed to the future of orchestras.
No comments yet.
Add your comment