Why Media?
These comments pose some interesting questions about what constitutes success. The St. Louis recordings under Vonk, which seemed not to have had much circulation (partly out of lack of promotion) were extremely polished, but came into the world in the wake of more distinctive repertoire from Vonk’s predecessor Leonard Slatkin. Expectations would have to be high, particularly since the orchestra had been declared in many quarters to be better than many of America’s Big Five.
Nashville’s recent recordings, which I consider to be a success, are less posh on a number of levels, but surprised a lot of people with their well-defined interpretive viewpoints and interesting repertoire (Beethoven Missa Solemnis, Elliott Carter Piano Concerto, lots of Villa Lobos). And this is where the Naxos association might’ve worked very well for the orchestra – with a budget price and coming from a city far better known for country music, those discs had no steep expectations awaiting them. Also, Nashville’s new Porgy and Bess, which is now coming out on Decca, represents a serious and valid revisionist viewpoint on the piece itself (cuts are restored, after years of the opposite).
So Nashville seems to be doing it right. But what’s right for Nashville may not be right for anybody else.
No comments yet.
Add your comment