Auditioning the Audition Process
I strongly disagree with the moderator’s assertion that “orchestras over here view it as merely a confirmation of a decision already made.” Quite the contrary, denial of tenure is occurring much more frequently than the moderator’s example. And from my viewpoint at the AFM, I have received far too many calls where the unexpressed reason for denial of tenure had not to do with the probationary musician’s performance ability, or their ability to work with the Music Director, section or others, or general behavior/demeanor, but with the probationary musician’s insufficient efforts to patronize the Music Director and other key political leaders in the orchestra, otherwise known as ass kissing.
Inherent in this question is an assumption that US orchestras are somehow doing something wrong because they may not be denying tenure at the same rate as the Berlin Philharmonic, IF that is in fact the case. As I have said numerous times in this discussion, I firmly believe in the right of each orchestra and its membership to determine what is right for them. If an orchestra feels that their tenure process in their orchestra is working for them, so what?
But for the moment let us assume that the moderator’s premise is the case. In that event, I would think it comes down to Fergus McWilliam’s point number one. In the Berlin Philharmonic, the vacancy belongs to the orchestra. In the US, the vacancy is in the domain of the Music Director, notwithstanding that the Music Director may consult with certain musicians about his/her decision.
If an orchestra an orchestra feels that the tenure process in their orchestra is not working for them, then they need to discuss that with their Music Director.
No comments yet.
Add your comment